Ceftazidime/avibactam versus other antibiotics for the treatment of KPC carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales bacteremia: real-life data from a university hospital in Argentina
Published 2023-12-23
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 Fabian Herrera, Andrés Nicolás Rearte, Jairo Chevel Mejía, Diego Torres, Federico Nicola, Jimena Nievas, Elena Temporiti, Florencia Bues, Rocío Rojas, María Victoria Leone, Marcia Querci, Pablo Bonvehi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Background: KPC-producing Enterobacterales bacteremia (KPC-CPE) is associated with a high mortality rate and limited therapeutic options. Aim: To describe and compare the outcome of patients with KPC-CPE bacteremia treated with ceftazidime/avibactam (CA) versus other antibiotics (OA). Methods: Prospective and retrospective cases and control study performed in adult patients with KPC-CPE bacteremia, with a 1:2 ratio between cases treated with CA and controls treated with OA. Clinical, epidemiological, and outcome variables were analyzed. Results: Forty-eight patients (16 CA and 32 OA) were included. Cases were more frequently neutropenic (50 vs. 16%, p=0.012), presented higher median APACHE II score and lower Pitt score. Of the total cohort, 65% had a clinical source, and Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most frequently isolated microorganism. Cases received more adequate empirical antibiotic treatment (81 vs. 53%, p=0.05). Targeted antibiotic therapy in cases and controls was combined in 38 and 91%, p=0.009. Cases had a lower 7-day mortality and 30-day infection-related mortality (0 vs. 22%, p=0.04 and 0 vs. 34%, p=0.008). Only controls developed shock, were admitted to the intensive care unit, and had breakthrough bacteremia. Conclusion: CA showed clinical benefit over OA in the treatment of patients with EPC-KPC bacteremia.